See our finalized


To sign up, start the process by viewing our


STATE LEAGUE-BY-LEAGUE STANDINGS PAGES  
 
find a team     
NATIONAL TEAMS (updated immediately after games)

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 0-0, 116



2) xxxxx (xxxxx, MD) 0-0, 101.6

3) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 93.8


4) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 83.9
5) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 82.6
6) xxxxx (xxxxx, AL) 0-0, 81.3
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, NV) 0-0, 80.7
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 79.9
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 77.7
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 76.8
11) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 76.8
12) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 76.7
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points
current mythical national title contenders
states represented: CA (4), GA (2), TX (2), AL, NV, MD, FL

With projection ratings (right column), recent results are weighted more heavily and the "politically correct" moderately-low cutoff point at which margin of victory is no longer counted is eliminated.  Standard ratings acknowledge to-date success ("resume"); with projection ratings, the goal is to accurately predict future outcomes.  For states using ratings to determine playoff teams, it is recommended that standard ratings be used for selection (determining who is in), and projection ratings be used for seeding the teams that make it in.
NATIONAL TEAMS BY PROJECTION RATINGS

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 0-0, 148.3



2) xxxxx (xxxxx, MD) 0-0, 133.9

3) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 127.6


4) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 117.7
5) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 116.4
6) xxxxx (xxxxx, AL) 0-0, 113.6
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, NV) 0-0, 113
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 112.2
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 110.6
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 110.2
11) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 110
12) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 109.1
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points
current best teams nationally
states represented: CA (5), GA (2), AL, NV, MD, TX, FL
NATIONAL TOP 20 OFFENSES (predictive)

1) XXXXX (XXXXX, FL) 74.1


2) XXXXX (XXXXX, CA) 64.6
3) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 64.4 [def: 106]
4) XXXXX (XXXXX, MD) 64.3
5) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 63.3 [def: 264]
6) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 61.9 [def: 24]
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 61.8 [def: 36]
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 61.1 [def: 708]
9) XXXXX (XXXXX, TX) 59.8
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, UT) 59.8 [def: 33]
11) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 57.5 [def: 23]
12) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 57.4 [def: 25]
13) XXXXX (XXXXX, AL) 56.9
14) XXXXX (XXXXX, GA) 56.1
15) xxxxx (xxxxx, SC) 56 [def: 321]
16) XXXXX (XXXXX, AZ) 55.5
17) XXXXX (XXXXX, CA) 55.3
18) XXXXX (XXXXX, CA) 54.5
19) xxxxx (xxxxx, TN) 54.5 [def: 55]
20) xxxxx (xxxxx, MD) 54.5 [def: 84]
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points
current national top offenses
states represented: CA (6), GA (4), TX (2), MD (2), FL, UT, TN, AZ, SC, AL		NATIONAL TOP 20 DEFENSES (predictive)

1) XXXXX (XXXXX, FL) 74.1

2) XXXXX (XXXXX, MD) 69.6

3) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 63.3 [off: 22]
4) XXXXX (XXXXX, CA) 62.9
5) XXXXX (XXXXX, CA) 61.8
6) xxxxx (xxxxx, NV) 58.8 [off: 24]
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 57.5 [off: 33]
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 56.9 [off: 28]
9) XXXXX (XXXXX, AL) 56.7
10) XXXXX (XXXXX, GA) 56.1
11) XXXXX (XXXXX, CA) 55.3
12) xxxxx (xxxxx, NJ) 53.5 [off: 38]
13) XXXXX (XXXXX, AZ) 53.1
14) xxxxx (xxxxx, MD) 52.2 [off: 68]
15) xxxxx (xxxxx, NC) 52.1 [off: 83]
16) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 51.9 [off: 27]
17) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 50.4 [off: 114]
18) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 49.6 [off: 42]
19) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 49.3 [off: 29]
20) XXXXX (XXXXX, TX) 49.2
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points
current national top defenses
states represented: CA (5), TX (3), FL (3), MD (2), GA (2), AL, NJ, AZ, NV, NC
TEXAS TEAMS (resume)

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 76.8
2) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 76.7

3) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 71.9
4) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 70

5) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 64.1
6) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 62.3
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 62
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 60
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 59.8

10) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 54.9
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points


TEXAS TEAMS (predictive)

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 109.1
2) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 109

3) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 104.2
4) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 102.3

5) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 96.4
6) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 94.6
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 94.3
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 92.3
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 92.1

10) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 87.2
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points
GEORGIA TEAMS (resume)

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 79.9
2) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 77.7
3) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 74.8
4) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 73.8
5) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 73.1


6) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 63.7

7) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 59.4
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 58.4
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 55.8
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 54.5
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points


GEORGIA TEAMS (predictive)

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 112.2
2) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 110
3) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 107.1
4) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 106.1
5) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 105.4


6) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 96

7) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 91.7
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 90.7
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 88.1
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, GA) 0-0, 86.8
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points
CALIFORNIA TEAMS (resume)

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 93.8


2) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 83.9
3) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 82.6

4) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 76.8
5) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 76.4


6) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 65.5
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 63.7
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 62.5
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 60.4
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 57.6
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points


CALIFORNIA TEAMS (predictive)

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 127.6


2) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 117.7
3) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 116.4

4) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 110.6
5) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 110.2


6) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 99.3
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 97.5
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 96.3
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 94.2
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, CA) 0-0, 91.4
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points
FLORIDA TEAMS (resume)

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 0-0, 116






2) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 0-0, 73


3) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 0-0, 61.9
4) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 0-0, 61.2
5) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 0-0, 58.4

6) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 0-0, 51.2
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 0-0, 50.1
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 0-0, 48.6
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 0-0, 47.1
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 0-0, 46.7
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points


FLORIDA TEAMS (predictive)

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 0-0, 148.3






2) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 0-0, 105.3


3) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 0-0, 94.2
4) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 0-0, 93.5
5) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 0-0, 90.7

6) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 0-0, 83.5
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 0-0, 82.4
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 0-0, 80.9
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 0-0, 79.4
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, FL) 0-0, 79
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points
the states to show top 10s for (and the order they're shown in) is based on current and therefore will change over time...current top 6 states:
RankStateNon-State W-L

(top 50 teams in state only)		Average Rating

(top 50 teams in state only)		Average Schedule Strength

(top 50 teams in state only)
1Texas4-35532.1
2Georgia22-35434.4
3California23-649.634.7
4Florida19-1845.624.2
5Ohio39-843.222
6Alabama13-736.120.9
NATIONAL 6/8/9-MAN TEAMS

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 109.6


2) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 98.5


3) xxxxx (xxxxx, NE) 0-0, 87.7
4) xxxxx (xxxxx, ID) 0-0, 83.8
5) xxxxx (xxxxx, CO) 0-0, 81.2
6) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 80.3
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 77.4
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 75.8
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 75.8
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 74.2
11) xxxxx (xxxxx, AZ) 0-0, 74.1
12) xxxxx (xxxxx, NE) 0-0, 74
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points
current mythical 6/8/9-man national title contenders
states represented: TX (7), NE (2), CO, ID, AZ

With projection ratings (right column), recent results are weighted more heavily and the "politically correct" moderately-low cutoff point at which margin of victory is no longer counted is eliminated.  Standard ratings acknowledge to-date success ("resume"); with projection ratings, the goal is to accurately predict future outcomes.  For states using ratings to determine playoff teams, it is recommended that standard ratings be used for selection (determining who is in), and projection ratings be used for seeding the teams that make it in.
NATIONAL 6/8/9-MAN TEAMS BY PROJECTION RATINGS

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 98.9


2) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 87.1




3) xxxxx (xxxxx, NE) 0-0, 69.7
4) xxxxx (xxxxx, ID) 0-0, 67.2
5) xxxxx (xxxxx, CO) 0-0, 64.5
6) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 62.7
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 61.7
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 61.5
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, NE) 0-0, 61.3
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 60.9
11) xxxxx (xxxxx, TX) 0-0, 59.6
12) xxxxx (xxxxx, NE) 0-0, 58.9
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points
current 6/8/9-man best teams nationally
states represented: TX (7), NE (3), ID, CO
GENERAL LINKS








contact us

(reminder that we don't respond to emails)



RATINGS/PROJECTIONS














NATIONAL







PREVIOUS YEARS (past seasons are always free)

2025     2024

2023     2022

2021     2020

2019     2018

2017     2016

2015     2014

2013     2012

2011     2010

2009     2008

2007     2006

2005     2004

2003     2002

2001