hsratings.com

Pre-season 2026 info will be posted starting March 18th. At that time, 2025 will officially be a "previous season" and therefore will be free to the public

ATTENTION ALL H.S. FOOTBALL COACHES NATIONWIDE: We need your help in previewing your team. In 2026, we will once again be doing the first-of-its-kind national high school football preview, complete with individual team capsules for all 16,000 football-playing schools. Please click here to send us info about your team if you haven't yet received an email from us about this.

SUBSCRIPTION REQUIRED: after 24 seasons of our loyal site visitors being able to enjoy us keeping things free, starting with the 2025 season we will unfortunately not be able to do so going forward. As we turn the page on the now-failed model of funding the operation of our site by being a content provider to other sites, we'll be staying in house and will need to rely on our site frequenters and the subscription model to keep us afloat. Re: the we've implemented, we feel that we've bent over backwards to keep things affordable for casual fans who don't spend a great deal of time on our site-- the true addicts to what we do will be asked to pay more for near-unlimited access. Our hope is that you'll see that it actually makes a good deal of sense for the people who use the information we collect to fund the man-hours needed to do it. While other sites may have different areas of focus than us, having articles, pictures, player statistics or other content, please note that this is the only site in the country with complete national schedules/scores/standings. Sites such as cnnsi/sblive, on3/massey, maxpreps (as high as 90-95% in some states, far lower in others), etc. rely on scores that happen to be reported to them, rather than actively collecting them as we do, and as you've likely seen, they tend to end the season with 50-80% of any given team's results and have irrelevant league standings, ratings, etc. as a result.

ON ANOTHER TOPIC... Need math tutoring? Let your child (or players if you're a coach) have the unique opportunity to be tutored by one of the industry-leading sports math minds working today. Tutoring available nationally (by zoom) and available in-person for Marin County, California residents; see nationalmathtutoring.com for more info. Subjects offered include: General Mathematics (grade school math), SAT/ACT/GED math section standardized test prep, Pre-Algebra/Algebra/Algebra 2, Geometry, Trigonometry, AP Statistics/Probability And Statistics, AP Precalculus, AP Calculus AB/BC, AP Computer Science/Computer Programming/Coding and Philosophy/Ethics/Logic/Critical Thinking.

STATE LEAGUE-BY-LEAGUE STANDINGS PAGES

find a team
FINAL NATIONAL TEAMS (updated immediately after games)

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 15-0, 90.6

2) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 11-3, 84.1
3) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 8-1, 81.7
4) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 11-1, 80.4
5) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 14-1, 79.2
6) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 9-0, 78.1
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 9-2, 77.3
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 15-0, 76.8
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 11-2, 76.2
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 15-0, 76.2
11) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 8-3, 75.7
12) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 10-1, 74.5
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points
current mythical national title contenders
states represented:

With projection ratings (right column), recent results are weighted more heavily and the "politically correct" moderately-low cutoff point at which margin of victory is no longer counted is eliminated. Standard ratings acknowledge to-date success ("resume"); with projection ratings, the goal is to accurately predict future outcomes. For states/sections using ratings to determine playoff teams, it is recommended that standard ratings be used for selection (determining who is in), and projection ratings be used for seeding the teams that make it in.
FINAL NATIONAL TEAMS BY PROJECTION RATINGS

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 8-1, 109.1

2) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 11-3, 104.2
3) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 15-0, 102
4) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 14-1, 100.6
5) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 9-2, 99.7
6) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-2, 99.2
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 9-0, 99
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 13-3, 98.9
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 15-0, 98.1
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-2, 96.5
11) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 14-1, 94.4
12) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 8-3, 93.1
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points
current best teams nationally
states represented:
FINAL NATIONAL TOP 20 OFFENSES (predictive)

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 61.8 [def: 111]

2) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 57.3 [def: 50]
3) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 56.7 [def: 31]
4) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 55.2 [def: 287]
5) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 55.1 [def: 919]
6) XXXXX (XXXXX, XX) 54.7
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 54.7 [def: 97]
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 53.1 [def: 105]
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 52.5 [def: 37]
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 52.1 [def: 489]
11) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 51.2 [def: 879]
12) XXXXX (XXXXX, XX) 50.7
13) XXXXX (XXXXX, XX) 50.5
14) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 50.3 [def: 48]
15) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 49.9 [def: 158]
16) XXXXX (XXXXX, XX) 49.6
17) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 49.2 [def: 112]
18) XXXXX (XXXXX, XX) 48.7
19) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 48.5 [def: 175]
20) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 48.3 [def: 89]
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points
current national top offenses
states represented: XX (5) FINAL NATIONAL TOP 20 DEFENSES (predictive)

1) XXXXX (XXXXX, XX) 58.6
2) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 57.9 [off: 34]

3) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 52.7 [off: 60]
4) XXXXX (XXXXX, XX) 52.3
5) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 51.6 [off: 91]
6) XXXXX (XXXXX, XX) 50.2
7) XXXXX (XXXXX, XX) 49
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 48.8 [off: 157]
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 48.2 [off: 109]
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 47.5 [off: 87]
11) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 47.4 [off: 142]
12) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 46.8 [off: 54]
13) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 46.6 [off: 55]
14) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 46.4 [off: 28]
15) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 46.4 [off: 52]
16) XXXXX (XXXXX, XX) 45.8
17) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 45.7 [off: 83]
18) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 45.5 [off: 226]
19) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 45.2 [off: 88]
20) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 44.7 [off: 53]
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points
current national top defenses
states represented: XX (5)
FINAL TEXAS TEAMS (resume)

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 14-2, 73
2) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-2, 72.8
3) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 15-1, 70.2
4) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 13-3, 69.9
5) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 14-1, 69.8
6) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-2, 67.2
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 14-1, 66.5

8) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-2, 61.5
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 16-0, 61.1
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 11-3, 60
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points

FINAL TEXAS TEAMS (predictive)

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 13-3, 98.9
2) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-2, 96.5
3) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 14-1, 94.4
4) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 14-2, 91
5) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-2, 89.9
6) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 14-1, 88.5
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 15-1, 87.8
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 13-3, 85.1
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-2, 84.6
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-2, 83.8
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points
FINAL GEORGIA TEAMS (resume)

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 15-0, 90.6

2) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 14-1, 79.2
3) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 15-0, 76.8
4) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 15-0, 76.2

5) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-1, 70.9

6) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-2, 63.9
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-3, 63.1
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 15-0, 62.6
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-2, 62.3
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 10-2, 61.3
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points

FINAL GEORGIA TEAMS (predictive)

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 15-0, 102
2) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 14-1, 100.6
3) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 15-0, 98.1

4) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 15-0, 91.1
5) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-1, 90.9

6) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 15-0, 84.2
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-3, 83.7
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-2, 82.3
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-1, 81.9
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 11-3, 81.8
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points
FINAL CALIFORNIA TEAMS (resume)

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 11-3, 84.1

2) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 9-2, 77.3
3) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 11-2, 76.2
4) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 8-3, 75.7
5) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 10-1, 74.5

6) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 9-2, 67.8
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 3-9, 64.2
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-1, 64.1
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 14-1, 61.1
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 14-1, 60.4
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points

FINAL CALIFORNIA TEAMS (predictive)

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 11-3, 104.2

2) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 9-2, 99.7

3) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 8-3, 93.1
4) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 11-2, 92.7
5) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 10-1, 91.2

6) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 9-2, 83.1
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 3-9, 81
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 14-1, 80.3
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-1, 80
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 14-1, 79.8
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points
the states to show top 10s for (and the order they're shown in) is based on current and therefore will change over time...current top 6 states:
Rank State Non-State W-L

(top 50 teams in state only) Average Rating

(top 50 teams in state only) Average Schedule Strength

(top 50 teams in state only)
1 Texas 4-3 55 32.1
2 Georgia 22-3 54 34.4
3 California 23-6 49.6 34.7
4 Florida 19-18 45.6 24.2
5 Ohio 39-8 43.2 22
6 Alabama 13-7 36.1 20.9
FINAL NATIONAL 6/8/9-MAN TEAMS

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 14-0, 111.1

2) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 15-0, 103

3) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 13-1, 87.9
4) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-1, 86.9

5) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 11-1, 79.9
6) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-0, 78.6
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-1, 77.9
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 13-2, 77.6
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 11-3, 76.3
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 11-2, 76
11) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-3, 75.8
12) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 11-2, 74.6
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points
current mythical 6/8/9-man national title contenders
states represented:

With projection ratings (right column), recent results are weighted more heavily and the "politically correct" moderately-low cutoff point at which margin of victory is no longer counted is eliminated. Standard ratings acknowledge to-date success ("resume"); with projection ratings, the goal is to accurately predict future outcomes. For states/sections using ratings to determine playoff teams, it is recommended that standard ratings be used for selection (determining who is in), and projection ratings be used for seeding the teams that make it in.
FINAL NATIONAL 6/8/9-MAN TEAMS BY PROJECTION RATINGS

1) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 14-0, 91

2) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 15-0, 81.5

3) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-1, 73.6

4) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 13-1, 67.2
5) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-1, 65.8
6) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-0, 65.6
7) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 11-1, 62
8) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-1, 60.8
9) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-3, 60.2
10) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 12-0, 60.1
11) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 13-0, 58.9
12) xxxxx (xxxxx, xx) 11-2, 57.9
ratings rounded to nearest tenth
gaps between bunches of teams indicate clear breaks of 4+ points
current 6/8/9-man best teams nationally
states represented:
GENERAL LINKS

contact us

(reminder that we don't respond to emails)

RATINGS/PROJECTIONS

NATIONAL

PREVIOUS YEARS (past seasons are always free)

2024     2023

2022     2021

2020     2019

2018     2017

2016     2015

2014     2013

2012     2011

2010     2009

2008     2007

2006     2005

2004     2003

2002     2001