click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed

RankSchoolStateLeagueDivisionW-LLeague W-LDivision W-LRating (Rounded)Schedule StrengthOpponents' W-L
1Stewartsville (MO)   trendMissouri8-Man District 1 (8 Man)8 Man7-23-0 (1st)4-28.2-27.226-36
WINS: #656 Elwood (KS) (48-22), #842 South Nodaway (Barnard, MO) (42-22), #1085 DeKalb (MO) (48-12), #1244 Southwest (Ludlow, MO) (63-28), #1244 Miami (Amoret, MO) (56-22), Hardin-Central (Hardin, MO) (48-22), Norborne (MO) (54-34), LOSSES: #49 Mound City (MO) (50-0), #609 North Andrew (Rosendale, MO) (14-6)

















2DeKalb (MO)   trendMissouri8-Man District 1 (8 Man)8 Man2-62-1 (2nd)2-4-24.7-38.827-34
WINS: #1244 Miami (Amoret, MO) (32-24), #1244 Southwest (Ludlow, MO) (98-46), LOSSES: #477 St. Joseph Christian (St. Joseph, MO) (56-6), #552 Stewartsville (MO) (48-12), #609 North Andrew (Rosendale, MO) (28-22), #656 Elwood (KS) (44-12), #842 South Nodaway (Barnard, MO) (46-0), Nodaway Valley co-op [West Nodaway/Nodaway-Holt] (Burlington Junction, MO) (68-16)









3Southwest (Ludlow, MO)   trendMissouri8-Man District 1 (8 Man)8 Man1-70-3 (4th)1-6-42.0-44.825-30
WINS: #1294 Union Star (MO) (72-12), LOSSES: #477 St. Joseph Christian (St. Joseph, MO) (59-14), #552 Stewartsville (MO) (63-28), #609 North Andrew (Rosendale, MO) (58-30), #842 South Nodaway (Barnard, MO) (60-6), #1085 DeKalb (MO) (98-46), #1244 Miami (Amoret, MO) (34-14), Norborne (MO) (14-8)

4Miami (Amoret, MO)   trendMissouri8-Man District 1 (8 Man)8 Man1-81-2 (3rd)1-3-42.0-41.636-42
WINS: #1244 Southwest (Ludlow, MO) (34-14), LOSSES: #449 Pleasanton (KS) (70-22), #552 Stewartsville (MO) (56-22), #669 Marmaton Valley (Moran, KS) (54-2), #810 Williamsburg (KS) (48-14), #863 Cair Paravel (Topeka, KS) (34-28), #932 Crest (Colony, KS) (46-6), #1085 DeKalb (MO) (32-24), #1181 Kansas City East Christian Academy (Kansas City, MO) (36-0)



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed

RankSchoolStateLeagueDivisionW-LLeague W-LDivision W-LRating (Rounded)Schedule StrengthOpponents' W-L
1Mound City (MO)   trendMissouri8-Man District 2 (8 Man)8 Man10-14-0 (1st)9-159.2-15.751-42
WINS: #137 Worth County (Grant City, MO) (42-0), #184 Stanberry (MO) (46-28), #355 Nodaway-Holt (Graham, MO) (48-12), #489 South Holt (Oregon, MO) (54-14), #552 Stewartsville (MO) (50-0), #815 King City (MO) (64-6), #842 South Nodaway (Barnard, MO) (47-0), #1017 Craig/Fairfax (Craig, MO) (58-8), #1189 Fairfax (MO) (82-26), Nodaway Valley co-op [West Nodaway/Nodaway-Holt] (Burlington Junction, MO) (68-18), LOSSES: #137 Worth County (Grant City, MO) (29-16)



















2Nodaway-Holt (Graham, MO)   trendMissouri8-Man District 2 (8 Man)8 Man6-33-1 (2nd)5-322.6-17.938-37
WINS: #489 South Holt (Oregon, MO) (46-18), #625 North Nodaway (Hopkins, MO) (60-32), #815 King City (MO) (48-8), #1017 Craig/Fairfax (Craig, MO) (44-22), #1189 Fairfax (MO) (56-8), Nodaway Valley co-op [West Nodaway/Nodaway-Holt] (Burlington Junction, MO) (34-32), LOSSES: #49 Mound City (MO) (48-12), #137 Worth County (Grant City, MO) (48-26), #184 Stanberry (MO) (44-8)





3South Holt (Oregon, MO)   trendMissouri8-Man District 2 (8 Man)8 Man5-52-2 (3rd)5-413.0-17.546-38
WINS: #609 North Andrew (Rosendale, MO) (46-30), #625 North Nodaway (Hopkins, MO) (43-38), #815 King City (MO) (60-30), #1017 Craig/Fairfax (Craig, MO) (52-6), #1189 Fairfax (MO) (61-8), LOSSES: #49 Mound City (MO) (54-14), #137 Worth County (Grant City, MO) (59-19), #184 Stanberry (MO) (53-28), #355 Nodaway-Holt (Graham, MO) (46-18), Nodaway Valley co-op [West Nodaway/Nodaway-Holt] (Burlington Junction, MO) (48-34)

















4Craig/Fairfax (Craig, MO)   trendMissouri8-Man District 2 (8 Man)8 Man1-81-3 (4th)1-7-19.9-12.643-32
WINS: #1189 Fairfax (MO) (36-30), LOSSES: #49 Mound City (MO) (58-8), #137 Worth County (Grant City, MO) (53-6), #184 Stanberry (MO) (55-6), #355 Nodaway-Holt (Graham, MO) (44-22), #489 South Holt (Oregon, MO) (52-6), #625 North Nodaway (Hopkins, MO) (41-6), #815 King City (MO) (38-20), Nodaway Valley co-op [West Nodaway/Nodaway-Holt] (Burlington Junction, MO) (62-26)







5Fairfax (MO)   trendMissouri8-Man District 2 (8 Man)8 Man0-70-4 (5th)0-6-34.0-11.435-26
WINS: none, LOSSES: #49 Mound City (MO) (82-26), #137 Worth County (Grant City, MO) (65-20), #355 Nodaway-Holt (Graham, MO) (56-8), #489 South Holt (Oregon, MO) (61-8), #815 King City (MO) (74-26), #1017 Craig/Fairfax (Craig, MO) (36-30), Nodaway Valley co-op [West Nodaway/Nodaway-Holt] (Burlington Junction, MO) (78-46)



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed

RankSchoolStateLeagueDivisionW-LLeague W-LDivision W-LRating (Rounded)Schedule StrengthOpponents' W-L
1St. Joseph Christian (St. Joseph, MO)   trendMissouri8-Man District 3 (8 Man)8 Man6-33-0 (1st)6-113.8-3234-42
WINS: #609 North Andrew (Rosendale, MO) (70-34), #815 King City (MO) (70-32), #842 South Nodaway (Barnard, MO) (50-20), #1085 DeKalb (MO) (56-6), #1244 Southwest (Ludlow, MO) (59-14), #1294 Union Star (MO) (58-8), LOSSES: #137 Worth County (Grant City, MO) (50-20), #448 Veritas Christian (Lawrence, KS) (34-26), #656 Elwood (KS) (26-20)





2North Andrew (Rosendale, MO)   trendMissouri8-Man District 3 (8 Man)8 Man7-32-1 (2nd)5-35.2-35.637-38
WINS: #552 Stewartsville (MO) (14-6), #656 Elwood (KS) (46-34), #842 South Nodaway (Barnard, MO) (56-8), #1085 DeKalb (MO) (28-22), #1244 Southwest (Ludlow, MO) (58-30), #1294 Union Star (MO) (48-0), Norborne (MO) (72-30), LOSSES: #137 Worth County (Grant City, MO) (71-18), #477 St. Joseph Christian (St. Joseph, MO) (70-34), #489 South Holt (Oregon, MO) (46-30)







3South Nodaway (Barnard, MO)   trendMissouri8-Man District 3 (8 Man)8 Man2-50-2 (t 3rd)2-5-9.6-26.236-27
WINS: #1085 DeKalb (MO) (46-0), #1244 Southwest (Ludlow, MO) (60-6), LOSSES: #49 Mound City (MO) (47-0), #477 St. Joseph Christian (St. Joseph, MO) (50-20), #552 Stewartsville (MO) (42-22), #609 North Andrew (Rosendale, MO) (56-8), #625 North Nodaway (Hopkins, MO) (49-26)























4Union Star (MO)   trendMissouri8-Man District 3 (8 Man)8 Man0-30-2 (t 3rd)0-3-56.7-37.314-13
WINS: none, LOSSES: #477 St. Joseph Christian (St. Joseph, MO) (58-8), #609 North Andrew (Rosendale, MO) (48-0), #1244 Southwest (Ludlow, MO) (72-12)



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed

RankSchoolStateLeagueDivisionW-LLeague W-LDivision W-LRating (Rounded)Schedule StrengthOpponents' W-L
1Worth County (Grant City, MO)   trendMissouri8-Man District 4 (8 Man)8 Man11-13-0 (1st)10-142.3-11.756-46
WINS: #49 Mound City (MO) (29-16), #184 Stanberry (MO) (68-50), #355 Nodaway-Holt (Graham, MO) (48-26), #477 St. Joseph Christian (St. Joseph, MO) (50-20), #489 South Holt (Oregon, MO) (59-19), #609 North Andrew (Rosendale, MO) (71-18), #625 North Nodaway (Hopkins, MO) (62-8), #815 King City (MO) (71-22), #1017 Craig/Fairfax (Craig, MO) (53-6), #1189 Fairfax (MO) (65-20), Nodaway Valley co-op [West Nodaway/Nodaway-Holt] (Burlington Junction, MO) (42-16), LOSSES: #49 Mound City (MO) (42-0)



2Stanberry (MO)   trendMissouri8-Man District 4 (8 Man)8 Man6-22-1 (2nd)5-237.1-13.438-31
WINS: #355 Nodaway-Holt (Graham, MO) (44-8), #489 South Holt (Oregon, MO) (53-28), #625 North Nodaway (Hopkins, MO) (52-10), #815 King City (MO) (55-32), #1017 Craig/Fairfax (Craig, MO) (55-6), Nodaway Valley co-op [West Nodaway/Nodaway-Holt] (Burlington Junction, MO) (56-28), LOSSES: #49 Mound City (MO) (46-28), #137 Worth County (Grant City, MO) (68-50)

















3North Nodaway (Hopkins, MO)   trendMissouri8-Man District 4 (8 Man)8 Man3-51-2 (3rd)3-43.9-18.533-32
WINS: #815 King City (MO) (33-30), #842 South Nodaway (Barnard, MO) (49-26), #1017 Craig/Fairfax (Craig, MO) (41-6), LOSSES: #137 Worth County (Grant City, MO) (62-8), #184 Stanberry (MO) (52-10), #355 Nodaway-Holt (Graham, MO) (60-32), #489 South Holt (Oregon, MO) (43-38), Nodaway Valley co-op [West Nodaway/Nodaway-Holt] (Burlington Junction, MO) (56-41)





4King City (MO)   trendMissouri8-Man District 4 (8 Man)8 Man2-80-3 (5th)2-7-7.9-14.348-35
WINS: #1017 Craig/Fairfax (Craig, MO) (38-20), #1189 Fairfax (MO) (74-26), LOSSES: #49 Mound City (MO) (64-6), #137 Worth County (Grant City, MO) (71-22), #184 Stanberry (MO) (55-32), #355 Nodaway-Holt (Graham, MO) (48-8), #477 St. Joseph Christian (St. Joseph, MO) (70-32), #489 South Holt (Oregon, MO) (60-30), #625 North Nodaway (Hopkins, MO) (33-30), Nodaway Valley co-op [West Nodaway/Nodaway-Holt] (Burlington Junction, MO) (32-6)



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed



click the "trend" link for a given team to view more detailed info on how their rating was arrived at

note: only teams with 3+ games listed